Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-05-09 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-05-09 House Journal Page 1751 SB 29 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 29(FIN) "An Act relating to certain programs of state aid to municipalities and recipients in the unorganized borough; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page CRA RPT HCS(CRA) 4DP 2NR 1AM 506 SENATE FISCAL NOTE (S.FIN) 2/6/97 506 FIN RPT HCS(FIN) 5DP 2NR 1443 SENATE FISCAL NOTE (S.FIN) 2/6/97 1444 RLS RPT HCS(RLS) 5DP 1NR 1714 SENATE FISCAL NOTE (S.FIN/REV) 2/6/97 1714 Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: 1997-05-09 House Journal Page 1752 SB 29 HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 29(RLS) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Therriault: Page 2, line 15: Delete "SAFE" Page 3, line 2: Delete "SAFE" Page 4, line 19: Delete "Safe communities" Insert "Communities" Page 4, line 20: Delete "safe" Page 4, line 21: Delete "safe" Page 4, line 23: Delete "safe" Page 4, line 29: Delete "safe" Page 5, line 3: Delete "safe" Page 5, line 9: Delete "safe" Page 6, line 9: Delete "safe" Page 6, line 31: Delete "safe" 1997-05-09 House Journal Page 1753 SB 29 Page 7, line 15: Delete "safe" Page 7, line 22: Delete "safe" Representative Therriault moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Kemplen objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 29(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Bunde, Cowdery, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, James, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Masek, Moses, Ogan, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Vezey Nays: Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Grussendorf, Hudson, Ivan, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kott, Kubina, Mulder, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Williams Absent: Sanders And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 5, lines 16-17: Delete all material. Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Grussendorf objected. 1997-05-09 House Journal Page 1754 SB 29 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 29(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Hanley, Hodgins, Kelly, Kookesh, Martin, Masek, Ogan, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Nays: Austerman, Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kemplen, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Williams Cowdery changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Therriault: Page 5, lines 18-21: Delete all material. Representative Therriault moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 29(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Masek, Ogan, Rokeberg, Ryan, Therriault, Vezey 1997-05-09 House Journal Page 1755 SB 29 Nays: Austerman, Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Davis, Elton, Grussendorf, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kott, Kubina, Mulder, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Williams Absent: Moses, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 7, line 16: Delete "$29,402,300" Insert "the amount appropriated to the fund for fiscal year 1998" Page 7, line 18: Delete "$29,402,300" Insert "the amount appropriated to the fund for fiscal year 1998" Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 29(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia, Ryan, Vezey Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Williams And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. 1997-05-09 House Journal Page 1756 SB 29 Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 5, line 10: Delete "only" Page 5, line 10, following "for": Delete "the following services in the following ranking of priority" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 29(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Foster, Hodgins, Kelly, Kohring, Kookesh, Martin, Masek, Ogan, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey Nays: Austerman, Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Davis, Elton, Green, Grussendorf, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kemplen, Kott, Kubina, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Williams Absent: Barnes, Dyson, Hanley And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 29(RLS) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 29(RLS) was read the third time. 1997-05-09 House Journal Page 1757 SB 29 The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 29(RLS) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 29(RLS) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 38 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kemplen, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams Nays: Hanley Absent: Barnes And so, HCS CSSB 29(RLS) passed the House. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Therriault gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on HCS CSSB 29(RLS).